POLALA.COM
welcome to my space
X
Welcome to:polala.com
Search:  
NAVIGATION - HOME

venezuelan politics

Published by: wktd 2008-11-20

  • how to win a presidency in venezuela, guidelines to follow from the begining to the win.what kind of candidate will be popular to the people.what kind of staff and how long should be the campaingning process and cost in $$$. Would it be possible for a venezuelan single women in her 30ths to run for 2006 and she belongs to no existing party and if so does she needs to sing up to a party and how easy could that be and guidelines to follow, would she still have time to participate in the 2006 presidency, please answer all of the above base on her running. thank you myname300


  • Hello 'your name' " Would it be possible .." Short ansver is NO. For elaboration, you would have to tell us a bit more about your situation, not just age and marital status. Other factors may have some effects, such as What is your politics? Do you have (rich) sponsors (s.g. some organisation in N. America?) What is your motive? .... etc


  • Hi myname300, Thank you for asking your interesting question. I do love learning about other countries, so it was a pleasure for me to research so much into Venezuelan politics. Here are some things that you would have to focus on in order to run for this presidency. Overall, Hugo Chavez is extremely popular and would be tremendously difficult to beat. However, he does have weaknesses and I have outlined them. He is full of ideas, but mostly empty promises (as many politicians are). Although he ran on an anti-corruption and anti-poverty platform in the 1998 election, corruption and poverty have continued unabated in Venezuela. The murder rate has tripled under his regime, jobs have not been created, and corruption might have even increased. Here is a list of past presidents of Venezuela for your information: http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-presidents-of-venezuela --------------------------------- 1. Popularity-- building a base of voters Hugo Chavez, the incumbent Venezuelan president, is extremely popular, but that does not mean that other candidates do not enjoy a modicum of popularity, either. In order to have a chance at being elected, it helps to be well-known either in politics already or outside of politics, and well-liked. For example, a week ago, a popular comedian named Benjamin Rausseo declared his candidacy. He will probably not win, but he has more of a chance due to the fact that many voters already know him and like him, if not in a political manner. (1) The Economist writes: "Another headache for Mr Rosales is the emergence of a maverick candidate, Benjam n Rausseo, who could steal votes from him. There are rumours that the government is funding this bawdy comic who calls himself the Count of Gu charo (a reference to a noisy bird from his home state in the east). Whether or not that is true, he almost perfectly matches the profile of the ?outsider? some pollsters see as the ideal rival to Mr Ch vez." (3) Chavez is so popular that at first, it was unclear whether opposition parties would even nominate a candidate to run against him. But the opposition parties have rallied around the candidacy of Manuel Rosales, the governor of Zulia, the state which contains Venezuela's second most important city, Maracaibo. He won a primary held by a number of opposition parties. Chavez was actually overthrown in a coup during his last term in office, but won a recall referendum and has enjoyed runaway popularity ever since, probably because of a wave of oil money that Venezuela is currently enjoying. The Economist writes that "The divided and leaderless opposition, by contrast, has toiled in the political wilderness." (2) Chavez has the backing of 55 percent of voters in various opinion polls. The coup was led by some of Venezuela's private media sources and by those in the upper class in Venezuela-- who in the country's Chavez-led move to communism have gotten short shrift. He heads a left-wing, populist movement called "Chavismo." Here are some details on Chavez's manner in public which has probably won over voters, from the Guardian: "On stage, Ch vez is entertaining, like a stand-up comedian, and very physical: he mimes the way people cringe away from him in horror when they first meet this terrifying dictator. But in person he is thoughtful and concentrates carefully on the details." (11) The dominant party that was ousted when Chavez came to power, Democratic Action, now has a leader, Henry Ramos, who says that any opposition to Chavez are ?drunks fighting over an empty bottle?, because Venezuela is in such a bad place politically right now. While Chavez's popularity may seem insurmountable to an opponent, keep in mind that popularity is fleeting, rather than enduring, and can change over the years as the political climate changes. At one time, Chavez was in prison for two years for trying to overthrow a previous president in a military coup. Now, rather than emphasizing his military past as a soldier, he positions himself as a populist who cares about the common people. He gained their trust by traveling around during his 1998 campaign and talking to them in a charismatic and ribald way, and an equally charismatic opponent could try to do the same. ---------------------------------- 2. Money. In almost any country, in order to win the top job one must have the resources to do so. Chavez, actually, has come under fire for utilizing too many resources-- he's used public funds to fund his current campaign. Amid criticism of this, the electoral authority has promised to not allow him to do so. In order to win an election in Venezuela, as in many other countries, a candidate would need millions of dollars in order to win. As mentioned above, Benjamin Rausseo, the comedian, is thought to be funded by sources in the government opposed to Chavez. In any case, in order to win this election, major amounts of money from some source would be required-- Chavez and Rausseo seem to have the government's almost-endless amounts of taxpayer dollars funding them, and a candidate to oppose them would need major cash, also. A possible source could be US interests or another country's interests. The Guardian reported today that the US has possibly been funding anti-Chavez opposition through an international aid agency, money that was given to help fund democracy by its US Agency for International Development (USAID). The US has also recently made $80 million available to groups seeking to change the political climate in Cuba, Venezuela's ally. This could be a powerful source of money that would be able to put forth a campaign on par with the public resources of Chavez and apparently Rausseo, as mentioned above. (10) However, this might not be the best move politically, as your opponents would probably confront you with the fact that you had taken "gringo money," as Chavez has called it. (13) However, these particular grants' recipients have not been made public by the US on grounds that they would be harassed by the Chavez government-- so it might not be publicly known if you had this source of money. However, if known, it is possible that charges could be brought against you and prison time faced-- for various charges probably unrelated to the actual accepting of the money, as faced by the leaders of Sumate (13). In addition, by making friends with many of the country's well-placed elite who are opposed to Chavez (he often takes away private companies and lands and places them in the public domain), one could find themselves with many donations to a campaign fund. Incidentally, it appears that taking money from foreign sources is only looked down upon by Chavez if the source is American-- his 1998 campaign was funded in large part by foreign banks, including Spain's Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA) and Banco Santander, which gave him millions of dollars. ---------------------------------- 3. Political Party-- In order to win, you would have to be affiliated with some type of political party. To have the best chance of winning, you would already be an established memeber of a party and they would nominate you as their candidate. Rausseo did not have his own party backing, so he created his own one-man political party, called the Independent Party for Advanced Answers. This may not help himn in the election, however, as being affiliated with a large political party can garner a candidate automatic votes from fellow party members. However, his candidacy shows that major party backing is not necessary simply to run for president of Venezuela-- and, in fact, it could be a detriment, as voters dislike the Chavez opposition parties and the candidates affiliated with them. Other than Chavez, candidates in Venezuela seem to represent small, assorted and diverse political parties. Rosales' heads his own party, called A New Time. Following the lead of Rosales and Rausseo, it would be possible to begin your own political party and come up with your own platform, but you would have to work extra hard to gain supporters for your ideas and donations from those supporters. Your best chance would be to create your own political party or unite with one that is not affiliated with the opposition that Chavez discredited in the election of 1998, as they are widely mistrusted by the public. These are the democratic Acci n Democr tica and the Christian democratic Comit de Organizaci n Pol tica Electoral Independente (COPEI). As Chavez did in that election, your best hope would be to discredit the opposition by charging them with corruption and failure to carry out their promises to the people. I detail this more in the "Agenda" section below. The Economist writes, "Many Venezuelans have hitherto been inclined to absolve Mr Ch vez of personal blame [for the government's failures]. But their discontents provide scope for an independent candidate not identified with the discredited opposition." (14) A possible party could be Proyecto Venezuela, which ran against Chavez in the 1998 election and garnered 2.6 million votes to his 3.6 million. ----------------------------- 4. Agenda-- In order to run for president, you would have to stand for something clear and advantageous to voters, in order to convince them to vote for you. This is in part what makes Chavez so popular-- Venezuela is flush with money from oil right now and he has incorporated that money into various social programs and job schemes targeted to the poor and working class constituents. He is also good at communicating with them and seeming to make a connection with them. Many voters trust him over leaders of opposition parties, which have been in power in the past but were discredited when Chavez was elected. A central element of your philosophy would be whether you take a communist stance, such as Chavez does, or whether you are more of a democratic nature. Much of Chavez's opposition believes that he is not democratic enough and feel that his views are dangerous to the country, while Chavez's camp has portrayed the opposition as privileged people trying to keep their powers away from the underprivileged. This has led to Chavez's popularity on a wide level with Venezuelan citizens. Chavez has charisma and has convinced voters that he is a great president despite the fact that three fourths of Venezuelans think the overall government of the country is corrupt and incompetent. Here are some thoughts from the Economist on how he managed to accomplish this feat: "Yes, after seven years in power and a massive oil windfall, Mr Ch vez has finally created some health and education programmes for the urban poor. At last, poverty is falling (though it is still around 40%) in Venezuela?but it would be extraordinary if it were not, given the oil price. Yes, Mr Ch vez has twice been elected and remains popular. But he is running down his country's wealth. Having dismantled all checks, balances and independent institutions, his regime rests on his personal control of the state oil company, the armed forces and armed militias." (4) With the world's sixth-largest oil reserves, Venezuela is in a good place monetarily right now, and Chavez has funded literacy drives for the poor, health clinics in slums, free treatment to AIDS patients, and schooling for adults, all of which have helped make him extremely popular with those helped by these policies. He has taken up the mantle of the great Latin American leader, Simon Bolivar, and even had Venezuela renamed as the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, a move which was ratified by the public in a referendum. Chavez has been able to convince voters, 40 percent of whom in Venezuela are poor, that he is indeed a caring populist and wants to help them. He has mastered the art of spending oil money on certain ventures for the poor, while not actually having to come up with any kind of substantial policy that would give a long-term benefit to these citizens. An example, not directly Chavez's but from a mayoral ally, is this recent story of the seizure of two golf courses in order to build shantytowns for Caracas' poor. The mayor of Caracas, Juan Barreto, said of the move, "It's shameful to see people playing golf and just right there in front of them is a shantytown." (6) However, seizing the privately held golf courses to build more shantytowns for the poor does nothing to solve the actual problem of the fact that there are many, many poor people in Caracas who live in more and more shantytowns. It just builds more shantytowns! But, you can see how this is a good public relations move-- poorer people will think that the government is doing something helpful to them at the expense of rich people, even though they really will see no benefit from it other than a few more places to live (and two fewer places to work, as previously they might have been able to have jobs at these golf courses.) In addition, other people might not start businesses in the first place, afraid that the government will seize it, and consequently there will probably be fewer jobs created in Venezuela because of this act. Chavez has also seized privately held agricultural farmlands to build houses for the poor. As you can see, politics in Venezuela, as everywhere, is often more a matter of how one is seen of the moment by those who might vote for you rather than thinking up substantial policies that help everyone and solve problems in the long term. Chavez's policy of standing up to America, and George Bush in particular, has proved itself popular not only in Venezuela but in other Latin American countries as well. He always refers to America as an empire, and comes up with schemes such as a Venezuelan movie studio to rival Hollywood movies filmed about South America, that cater to Venezuelans' pride in themselves. America is the most powerful country in the world, and just as the golf course mowed down for the shantytowns, to see it ridiculed in favour of their own country gives Venezuelans pride in themselves, their own country and their accomplishments. " 'Hugo Chavez is extremely popular in Latin America. They love his style of standing up to Uncle Sam,' said Larry Birns, head of the Washington-based Council Of Hemispheric Affairs (COHA). "'In some places he is even more popular than that country's own president.'" (5) Chavez is popular, then, perhaps not just because of his anti-American sentiments, but also because those ideas help give all of Latin America an idea of strength and self-worth. There ARE some huge issues which Chavez does not do well on, which an opposing candidate could use to undermine him. Since he took office, the country's murder rate has tripled, and crime overall has experienced similar highs. Caracas is now South America's most violent capital, which is a huge issue considering how dangerous some of the other capitals are. Many of the suspected murderers are police themselves! The public prosecutor's office is currently investigating 6,000 killings supposedly committed by police officers. Since police officers are hired by the state, this really makes the government look bad and Chavez has no defense for it. Some people claim that gang members are purposely hired into the police force to enforce political force rather than actually fight crime, as the police are supposed to. This could explain the huge amounts of murders by the police. While Chavez is popular with poor people, most murders are committed in the slums and never receive media attention. But seeing so many people killed in their neighborhoods must worry poor Venezuelans, who make up most voters, and this is an issue that Chavez could be defeated on if used properly. (14) In addition, although Chavez took office by claiming corruption on the part of his opponents, corruption has continued under his regime, possibly even more so. Although he is a champion of the poor, Chavez has been able to help them only by giving them oil money for health clinics and literacy drives and things of that nature, and not jobs, which are the most important factor in whether a person will continue to be poor or not. Although the unemployment level has gone down from last year's 12 percent to 9 percent (after previously going up to 20 percent in 2003), Chavez is off base when he implies, "Unemployment in Venezuela is headed toward zero." (12) Jobs have been created in the public sector, but those will not last when the oil boom ends, or when the government realizes that it is vastly in debt and needs to get finances in line, whichever comes first. Chavez's attacks on private investment-- seizing private farms and the like-- do not give sorely needed jobs to poor Venezuelans. In addition, I believe a respected candidate could make much of the issue that Chavez champions himself as a man for the poor, a populist, and one of them, when he jet-sets around the world in designer suits and Cartier watches. He has placed members of his family in government jobs. (17) In addition, Chavez's most popular policy, nationalizing oil fields and taking them away from privately held companies from countries such as Norway and Italy, is not viable long-term. For now, oil prices are high and countries are willing to pay what Venezuela wants rather than back out of the country. But in the future, as oil prices decline, other countries will be much less willing to go to Venezuela, where their companies, land and products could simply be seized by the government. Venezuela is not as easy to mine for oil as many countries and therefore needs heavy investment in order to mine, find and produce the oil. If the oil fields are all state-owned, the state will have to provide all that money, and Chavez's heavy domestic spending on social programs has left the country in debt and probably unable to do this. In other words, the oil wealth of Venezuela is a cycle that will inevitably go round the other way-- to low oil prices and recession. Furthermore, Chavez is popular mostly because of his IDEAS, generic ideologies such as helping the poor, rather than his POLICIES, which have not really helped the poor too much and as seen above, have made the crime rate soar and killed many of those poor people. He realizes that. This is why he goes around shouting against America and its policies-- he knows that any real debate would expose his weaknesses, but being anti-American is a popular idea which will gain him votes. It makes no sense at all for a country to make its main ideology just being against another country and its ideas rather than focusing on its own ideas and policies, but that is what Chavez has done. For the upcoming election, Chavez has again tried to focus the spotlight on how he is anti-American, rather than real issues such as crime and safety, and jobs. The Economist writes: "Mr Ch vez will seek another six-year term at an election in December. The government wants to shift the political debate away from bread and butter issues. So Mr Ch vez is claiming that what is at stake in the election is an ideological conflict between the United States and Venezuela's ?Bolivarian revolution? and that his true opponent will be George Bush." In fact, rather than focus on Rosales' legitimate ideas concerning rates of poverty and jobs in the country, Chavez resorts to anti-American sentiments when referring to his opponent: "The other candidates are candidates of the empire ... lackeys of imperialism. They're the Venezuela of the past, which will never, ever return." (12) Rosales is the popular governor of a state in Venezuela; he has nothing to do with America and has nothing to do with the two political parties that Chavez ousted in the 1998 election. Why does Chavez accuse him of being a "lackey of imperialism," then? It is because these anti-American statements are popular and will turn the public against Rosales, even if untrue. Be prepared for continuing statements such as these from Chavez. Rosales actually had a pretty good reply: "I'm the candidate of the fatherland, of Venezuela. We don't have to bow before the United States, nor do we have to give away money to the bearded one, Fidel Castro." (12) The Economist writes that in the two months before this April 2006 story, there were 30 demonstrations by the poor in Caracas wanting the government to fulfil its promises of housing and jobs. The government's approval rating at that time was 14 percent. How can Chavez be so popular then when his government is not? Most Venezuelans like Chavez and are charmed by him, and are willing to believe that the government's shortcomings are not his fault. A charming leader from the opposition who could squarely place the blame on Chavez's shoulders would have a decent chance of getting elected-- none of the candidates so far have been able to do this, however. The biggest and best hope for you as far as being a candidate is being a fresh face with exciting ideas. According to the Economist, "A recent poll by one firm, Hinterlaces, found that ?someone new? (17%) and ?none of the above? (10%) came second and third in the list of voter preferences, well ahead of Mr Rosales (7%)." (2) The Venezuelans will probably choose Chavez, but that is possibly not that he is better than any candidates, but that he is better than the candidates that have presented themselves so far. Chavez came to power in a sweep of reforms that he called the "Bolivarian revolution," and similarly, a new candidate could come to enjoy just as much popularity by offering a package of their own, improved reforms. Chavez ended state privatization and cut oil production to increase prices. Large, sweeping, and broad reforms like these that challenge Chavez and would also help the poor could position a candidate to challenge Chavez. ------------------------------------ 5. Requirements According to the Venezuelan Constitution: http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=6831 "Only Venezuelans by birth who have no other nationality shall be permitted to hold the offices of President* of the Republic, Executive Vice President, Chairman* and Vice-Chairman* of the National Assembly..." "Article 227: In order to be elected President* of the Republic, it is necessary to be Venezuelan* by birth, with no other nationality, to be more than 30 years of age, not a member of the clergy and not subject* to any conviction by final judgment, as well as meeting fulfill other requirements prescribed in this Constitution." First, you would have to register with the National Electoral Council, or Consejo Nacional Electoral, (CNE) as an official candidate. A successful candidacy would have a large kickoff celebration-- attended by thousands of supporters and widely covered by international and national news organizations. This can be seen with Rousseo, and with Chavez, whose rally was covered by state television channels. At Rosales' rally, he gave a speech about how Chavez has not done enough for the poor. You would have to have the support of other opposition candidates and/or parties. The primary win of Rosales got him a lot of attention and he is now looked at as the major candidate to possibly beat Chavez. You would have to have lots of newspaper coverage. International coverage is desirable, of course, but national coverage by Venezuelan newspapers is probably preferable for getting the attention of voters and furthering your candidacy. Television coverage is also extremely important. The public channels support Chavez overall, while the private television channels stand in opposition to Chavez. As can be expected, government officials claim the private channels are biased, while the private channels maintain that they are just preserving freedom of expression in Venezuela. Chavez went so far as to order an investigation into the licenses that allow private channels to be on the air! You might have a better chance of getting coverage on the private channels. Here are television channels in Venezuela: * Globovisi n * La Tele * Meridiano Televisi n * Puma TV * Radio Caracas Televisi n (RCTV) * Televen * Vale TV * Venevisi n * Venezolana de Televisi n (VTV) * ViVe Here is what a group (keep in mind that the group is funded by Chavez's government) said about Venezuela's private media: ?After Ch vez came to power in 1998, the five main privately owned channels ? Venevisi n, Radio Caracas Televisi n (RCTV), Globovisi n, Televen and CMT ? and nine out of the 10 major national newspapers, including El Universal, El Nacional, Tal Cual, El Impulso, El Nuevo Pa s and El Mundo, have taken over the role of the traditional political parties, which were damaged by the president?s electoral victories. Their monopoly on information has put them in a strong position. The give the opposition support, only rarely reporting government statements and never mentioning its large majority?Their investigations, interviews and commentaries all pursue the same objective: to undermine the legitimacy of the government and to destroy the president?s popular support?the media is still directly encouraging dissident elements to overthrow the democratically elected president ? if necessary by force?? (9) What is clear from this statement is that Venezuela's media, despite the president's popularity, are not willing to give concessions to Chavez and give him tough coverage. This would be advantageous to a candidate trying to come into the campaign. --------------------- The Female Issue Would a woman be able to run and be elected as president in Venezuela? The answer, actually, is yes. Chavez himself faced an opponent who was a woman, Irene S ez, a former pageant queen and right-winger. S ez was helped by the fact that she was already very well-known in Venezuela-- she had been crowned Miss Venezuela and then Miss Universe in 1981. She had political experience, as the mayor of Chacao, a rich area of Caracas, and then governor of the Nueva Esparta state. S ez is not a threat to run for president again any time soon, as she now lives in Miami. As far as time frames, Chavez just kicked off his campaign on August 12, and Raussseo just announced on August 23. If you already met many of the requirements that I have outlined (the money, popularity and major party backing), now would not be too late to enter the race. However, the time it would take to fundraise and assimilate yourself into a major party if these have not already been done for the campaign would not allow time for a proper campaign, I fear. Here are some other things to think about: It is highly unlikely that a candidate could enter the race now, with no major party backing, and defeat Chavez. However, another election will be held in six years, and between now and then you could do your best to try and become the best candidate as possible and try to win the presidency of Venezuela. The election, even if won by someone other than Chavez, may very well be rigged in his favor anyway. The Economist reports that voters' fingerprints are taken at machines at the polls, which violates the secrecy of voting and can discourage qualified voters from showing at the polls, and paper ballots are not counted when machines malfunction. The Electoral Council (which only has members of Chavez's party on it) has refused to allow the registry of voters to be independently audited, leading many to suspect that the rolls of voters have been padded with fake names-- the rolls have oddly expanded by two million names in the past two years. And, as stated above, Chavez has tried to take away the licenses of private TV channels that are opposed to him. For these reasons, many opposition parties to Chavez have called for a boycott of the general election and fear that if a boycott is not held, many who oppose Chavez will believe the election is rigged anyway and won't show up at all. "Even opposition politicians who want to take part have warned the electoral council that, if it does not heed their demands for fair play, the president could be left to compete against himself. In response, Mr Ch vez has threatened to hold a simultaneous referendum to remove the constitutional limit of two consecutive presidential terms." (2) The Economist goes on to say that Chavez is so concerned about making sure the election goes his way because if voter turnout is low, the results could be close and not in his favor. Sources: 1. BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5280240.stm 2. The Ecomomist "Damned whatever they do" July 20, 2006 http://www.economist.com/world/la/displaystory.cfm?story_id=7194553 3. The Economist "The Opposition Finds a Leader" August 17, 2006 http://www.economist.com/world/la/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_SSJRRGT 4. The Economist "The battle for Latin America's soul" May 18, 2006 http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=6943528 5. BBC News "Chavez opponents face tough times" By Greg Morsbach December 6, 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4502272.stm 6. BBC News "Venezuela to seize golf courses" August 30, 2006 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5297246.stm?ls 7. The Guardian "Chavez film puts staff at risk, says Amnesty" Duncan Campbell in Los Angeles Saturday November 22, 2003 http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,12716,1090788,00.html 8. NPR "All Things Considered" "Venezuela Debates Media's Role in Campaign" by Clara Long July 3, 2006 http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5531034 9. http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/MediaOpposition.htm 10. The Guardian "US accused of bid to oust Ch vez with secret funds" Duncan Campbell August 30, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,,1860867,00.html 11. The Guardian "The world according to Ch vez" May 16, 2006 http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,,1775763,00.html 12. NC Times "Top Chavez opponent holds first campaign rally in Venezuela" By: FABIOLA SANCHEZ - Associated Press http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/08/20/news/politics/19_29_018_19_06.txt 13. USA Today "U.S. aid stirring suspicion in Venezuela" August 26, 2006 http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-08-26-us-aid-venezuela_x.htm 14. The Economist "Crimes and misdemeanours" April 20, 2006 http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=6832058 15. The Economist "What revolution?" October 7, 2004 http://www.economist.com/world/la/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3266984 16. The Economist "Farewell to the apertura petrolera" April 5, 2006 http://www.economist.com/agenda/displayStory.cfm?story_id=6767727 17. The Economist "The sickly stench of corruption" March 30, 2006 http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=6749208 18. The Economist "Mission impossible" February 16, 2006 http://www.economist.com/displayStory.cfm?story_id=5526589 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Spanish-language_television_channels#Venezuela http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Electoral_Council_(Venezuela) http://www.answers.com/topic/hugo-ch-vez http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irene_S%C3%A1ez http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuelan_presidential_election%2C_1998 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proyecto_Venezuela Search terms: venezuela popular candidate site:economist.com venezuela venezuela campaign staff venezuela private television channels national electoral council venezuela Irene S ez venezuelan president age requirement Thank you for your intriguing question. For your sake, I hope you have many political ties, donors and money to win this election, and if you do, don't forget those on Google Answers who helped you! :) If you don't have any of these connections yet, I hope I gave you an idea about what you can do so you could win an election in the future. Best of luck to you. If you need any further help or clarifications of my answer, please let me know and I'll be glad to assist you. Thank you! Cheers, --keystroke-ga
  • Jeffery R. Webber, "Venezuela from Below: Interview with Political ::
    Sep 9, 2008 Steve Ellner's latest book, Rethinking Venezuelan Politics: Class, Conflict, and the Chávez Phenomenon, for example, talks about the
    http://www.monthlyreview.org/mrzine/cm090908.html
    HOME
    Category:Politics of Venezuela - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia::
    Pages in category "Politics of Venezuela". The following 33 pages are in this category, out of 33 total. This list may sometimes be slightly out of date
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Politics_of_Venezuela
    HOME
    Red Pepper's Venezuela Blog: The New Politics of Political Aid in ::
    Tom Barry, senior analyst with the Americas Program of the Center for International Policy, argues that five years after US-funded groups were associated
    http://redpepper.blogs.com/venezuela/2007/07/the-new-politic.html
    HOME



    Where's The Advantage In Windows Genuine Advantage?
    Stocks Bounce After S&P Joins Bear Market

    You are looking at:polala.com's venezuelan politics, click polala.com to home
  • another website
  • are you for the welf
  • are you a quot deal
  •  
  • when alternating cur
  • report using erp as
  • close kept secrets t
  • #If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.#
    Your name:
    E-mail:
    Telphone:

    Your comments:


    If you have any other info about venezuelan politics , Please add it free.
     Homepage | Add to favorites | Contact us | Exchange links | LOGIN | Site map | 
    Copyright© 2008 polala.com        Site made:CFZ