As a gallery owner, I've seen all styles of signatures, placement, and technique of applying them. However, now that my work is starting to sell, I am finding myself wondering what is best. Some people put their name on the image digitally, others use a silver pen. Do you think a signature detracts from the image? Is it necessary to put it on the actual image? Comments? Thoughts? :greenpbl:
well... sales have been slow lately... haha dont know why
i usually use a large (1" across) paintbrush and red egshell enamel house paint (dutch boy brand) and sign the print across the middle.
http://tonybombardo.com/this.jpg Signing an Exit Waiver at Work - Jobs - IT Industry:: Now, is signing such a waiver required "by law" as claimed by my HR manager? .. Its another to say you cant do your work in the industry for the next http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/913745.htmlHOME |
:lol: --- yay, Tony! :biglaugh:
That's quite like it!
Your photos sell like hot buns, I am sure? :lmao:
I signing and date the back if with a soft B pencil so it does not cut into the paper, if its matte and frame I sign and date the matte in bottom right
i sign the bottom right of the matte and if it has a title, i title the bottom left of the matte. if i am selling it to a stranger, i sign the back.
Personally, I think the signature should go either on the front, but on the edge, where it will be hidden by a matte....or else on the back.
Where's The Advantage In Windows Genuine Advantage?
Stocks Bounce After S&P Joins Bear Market |