POLALA.COM
welcome to my space |
HOME  What do you think of same sex marriages? |
What do you think of same sex marriages? | | Published by: cfz 2009-01-09 |
| | Annulment without a marriage license::
If you did not obtain a marriage license in the county in which the of legal marriage to nonmarital relationships between persons of the same sex or
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=768411HOME |
My friends and i were discussing this last night when we went out for dinner. And i really disagree with same sex marriages i mean its fine if they want to live together and all but i really dont think its a moral thing and well give your opinion!!
two (or 3 or more) people of the same (or mixed) sex getting married doesn't affect or lessen my marriage or relationships and commitments.
what does lessen and degrade marriage are people who can get married but don't and yet still expect to have the same rights and privileges of marriage while avoiding the obligations of marriage.
I don't think its a moral issue either and the government needs to keep its nose out of it. To each there own is my motto.
I... I'm not a fan of gay sex. Thinking of Gary and Robert going down on each other makes me cringe, and my stomach turn. That said, I don't much care what people do behind closed doors; as long as I don't have to see any part of the gay sex.
I think they should be allowed to marry if they want.
Marriage as a religious term clearly defines itself as a union between a man and a woman, and that's good and fine, but religious terms don't hold much clout in law.
In law, marriage is just a word. The meanings of words change. Right now it's a union between a man and a woman, but that's not to say it couldn't (or shouldn't) change. That's why Atheists can get married just as well as Christians or Jews or anyone else; the legal definition of religion doesn't include any sort of God.
Church and state, they're separate. They're separate for a reason; the word of the Bible isn't always the word that the people want, or even the best word. As more and more evidence comes out proving that Gayness is determined by genetics rather than choice or being possessed by Evil Gay Spirits, Gayness is becoming more socially acceptable. I don't think people should be forced to live a life without marriage because of their genes. Even if it is just a word, marriage is a big deal that many people look forward to.
Retirement syndrome?::
Dissatisfaction with the quality of one?s marriage also correlated with Here are some things you can do to cope with these physical changes: ?
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/775777.htmlHOME |
guatemalan culture::
It was just something you can't do until you get married. way. tw: In terms of sex, what's the biggest sexual problem Guatemalan teens have to face?
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=344855HOME |
Morals don't dictate who you love or can be sexually attracted to, and generally accepted morals change over time. If we allow gay marriage now, 100 years from now, nobody would think twice about a gay couple. They'd say, "Oh, how nice for them."
Also, further elaborating on the first paragraph comes an odd double standard. Most straight males are sickened by the thought of manly gay sex, but aroused by womanly gay sex; myself included. Lesbians are a lot more socially acceptable than male gays, and I think it has a lot to do with men still running most things. Even on the internet, Lesbian porn is considered straight by most websites, because it's intended for straight male viewers. Looking back, this last paragraph was completely unrelated to the question, but I don't think I could get through typing gay that many times without also typing Lesbian a few times.
If they love eachother its fine. You can't help who you fall in love with. They didn't make straight people beg to be able to marry eachother...so why should they have to? It's not really hurting you is it? (By you I mean in general...not actually you). It's not like the world will implode on itself if a girl marrys a girl and a guy marries a guy.
I support same-sex marriage; I don't find it immoral. It is consistent with my morals to provide all citizens the same civil rights. Also, there is a difference between being personally against same-sex marriage and imposing your own personal morals upon someone else.
Marriage is a civil institution which allows spouses many rights that are not available to couples in domestic partnerships or civil unions. All people deserve to have the same government-protected rights whether they are in a life-long committed relationship with a man or a woman. Also, civil unions or domestic partnerships are not sufficient to ensure that people of all sexual orientations are guaranteed the same civil rights. The Supreme Court wisely decided that separate is inherently unequal, thus civil unions/domestic partnerships cannot be equal. The fact that they are separated is a badge of inferiority. Many religions recognize marriage as a religious institution in addition to a civil one. However, churches may choose which couples to marry. Also, straight couples are able to marry in a civil ceremony even if they are not religious. This is because the United States does not have a national religion; there is a separation of church and state.
i strongly disagree with same sex marriage, i think it should be illegal, and i agree that it is an unmoral act.
What I hate is that in a country where everyone is supposedly created equal we still have people who don't have the same options under the law. I think everyone should be legally allowed to marry whoever they want.
I hate that civil unions are being touted as substitutes for marriage. Let's throw you a bone and tell you this is the rights and responsibilities of marriage without using that word. It's crazy. The only way to make that fair is to divide the church side of marriage from the state side of marriage. Then the state would only grant the "civil union" or the legally binding part of marriage. Everyone married by the government would have a civil union, including all the husband's and wife's who decide to go the courthouse route.
Then let only the clergy (however they're certified by their denomination) perform marriages and add the church's blessing to the union. Anyone married in the church would have both a marriage and a civil union. And, hey, maybe some of the progressive churches could decide for themselves to do that for same sex couples. But churches that didn't feel like offering the service could turn same sex couples away...the same way some churches turn people who aren't members away already.
 Where's The Advantage In Windows Genuine Advantage?
 Stocks Bounce After S&P Joins Bear Market
|
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# | |
|
